The white Mizuno Runbird and logotype centred on a flat Mizuno blue fieldThe Runbird, one uninterrupted stroke on Mizuno blue

The challenge

Mizuno makes some of the most respected running and volleyball equipment in the world and sells it with the visual language of a 2007 catalogue. The craft was real; the storytelling was not. Younger runners knew the shoe and not the 120 years behind it.

The solution

We reduced everything to the stroke. The Runbird is redrawn as one uninterrupted movement — the same principle that governs the typography, the photography and the way product is shot. Vermilion appears once per layout, never twice. The restraint is the argument: this is a brand that has been doing one thing for a very long time.

Open blue-printed brand manual spread with a Runbird construction diagram.The manual argues the stroke before it shows product.
Phone on a bone-white surface showing a Mizuno product screen with a flat-laid graphite running jacket.Commerce reduced to one product and one rule.
A graphite half-zip technical jacket, shaped as a hollow ghost-mannequin form with closed collar and cuffs, on bone seamless with a small blue Runbird at the chest.Restraint carried on the garment, one mark only.
Ghost-mannequin running top and shoes on deep blue seamless in bone and graphite, marked once in vermilion.Vermilion appears once and the garment does the rest.
Flat-laid white running singlet with a large Mizuno-blue Runbird, raw-cut edges and a vermilion neck tape, on near-black.The singlet as specimen, one stroke across the chest.
Macro of a woven blue Mizuno label on a bone singlet hem.The label carries the year, set vertically.
Raking macro of blue printed pages with white numerals and one red dot.Ink and fold, read at the angle of the light.
Extreme macro of a white single-stroke Runbird on graphite technical fabric.One stroke, bonded, at the scale of the weave.
Macro of a bone white volleyball with a small blue Runbird on one panel.The other 120-year discipline, same single stroke.

Project Information

Mizuno's problem was not credibility. Ask any serious runner and the product reputation is intact. The problem was that nothing in the brand communicated the 120 years of obsession behind it.

The company had been competing on the terms of much younger brands — hype drops, athlete campaigns, seasonal colourways — and losing, because that game rewards volume and Mizuno's asset is patience.

We reduced everything to a single principle: one stroke. The Runbird was redrawn as one uninterrupted movement, the confidence of a brush mark rather than a constructed logo.

That principle then governs everything else. One accent per layout. One subject per frame. One idea per piece of communication. Vermilion appears exactly once and never twice, which makes its appearance an event.

The restraint is the argument. A brand that has done one thing for 120 years should not communicate like one that started last season.

CAIO BARRETO

Creative Direction:
Caio Barreto

Design:
Júlia Bertoldi, Nara Vasconcelos, Kwame Osei, Marina Yuki

Motion Design:
Rafael Duarte, Ingrid Sollberg

Interactive Design:
Caio Bastos, Elif Demir

Strategy & Copywriting:
Priya Raghunathan, No Alves

Project Management:
Helena Braga

Account Direction:
Diego Fontenelle

Operations:
Sofia Krammer

Image Direction:
Yuri Kagawa

Typography:
Júlia Bertoldi

Fonts:
Tazugane Gothic, Söhne — Monotype / Klim Type Foundry

Year:
2026

Brand Identity · Concept

Self-initiated concept work. Mizuno is not a client of CAIO BARRETO. Imagery generated, not photographed.